|
Written by April Gilford
|
|
Monday, 28 April 2008 13:04 |
|
The controversy over the the CW show OMFG Gossip Girls has been building for a while now. As the premier date draws nearer, the television station answered the accusations of foul language by stating that OMFG is just letters and could have many different meanings. Maybe they are hoping most parents will buy it. Maybe they think most parents are too stupid to realize the CW is pulling the wool over their eyes. Or maybe, they just don't care if they add the promotion of profanity and blasphemy to a show already riddled with teen sex, drugs, and whatever else their writers can disguise as "addressing valid teenage issues." OMFG has one meaning, and one meaning only. Oh My * God. I'll let you fill in the * with the appropriate four-letter word. The CNN reporters interviewed 30 people on the sidewalk. 28 of those 30 said that OMFG means one thing and one thing only. The 2 who did not know what it meant were women in their 50's. Which is exactly what the CW is banking on. Those parents with teens old enough to watch the show also will not know what OMFG stands for, or think it could be any number of things. Rational thought will tell you that the theory of multiple meanings is ridiculous. OMFG is part of what is commonly known as textspeak. These are sets of letters that stand for certain phrases and came into popular use with instant messaging and text messaging. It saves a lot of time in typing and speeds up the conversation. It is a universally user standardized and accepted practice in the world of the Internet. Whether you are chatting with someone across town, in New York, Hong Kong or Johannesburg, textspeak is the same in the English language. If it were not, as the CW would like you to believe, the whole practice would grind to a halt. No one would know what anybody was talking about if the same three or four letters had multiple meanings. Most textspeak has multiple uses by adding more letters to a basic starting group, but the meaning is the same. OMG stands for Oh my God! IDK stands for I don't know. Let's look at an example that has been expanded. LOL is laugh out loud. ROFL is rolling on the floor laughing. ROFLOL is rolling on the floor laughing out loud. ROFLMAO is rolling on the floor laughing my [three letter word for donkey] off. ROFLMFAO is rolling on the floor laughing my fat [donkey] off. You get the picture. Just like any other widely practiced system of acronyms, textspeak only works if the letters retain the same meaning universally. Does the military, perhaps the most diligent lover of acronyms, have multiple meanings for DOD? Does anyone ever think of anything besides Cable News Network for CNN? Of course not. The whole practical application of acronyms would be lost if DOD meant anything other than Department of Defense, or OMFG had any other meaning in textspeak. Don't be duped by the CW. They knew without a doubt what they meant when they named the show. They have managed with the aid of textspeak to shove blashpemy down the throats of our teenagers and our society, and because textspeak does not fall under the jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission, they are getting away with it.
|
|
Last Updated ( Monday, 28 April 2008 13:35 )
|
|
|
Written by April Gilford
|
|
Wednesday, 23 April 2008 07:09 |
|
"Going green" is the new catch phrase. Individuals, companies, cities, politicians and leaders are encouraged and expected to have policies of environmental concern and protection. While disagreements rage between scientific schools of thought on exactly what role mankind has played in the decline of our environment, there is no question that it is declining. Most likely the causes are a combination of human activity and natural earth cycles. The pressing question of the day is not so much what did we do to bring it about, but what can we do to slow the process. Do Christians have an obligation to the environment? Absolutely. Our responsibility is to the earth as a creation of God and also to the ramifications on people and societies. And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so. And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good. And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so. And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day. (Gen. 1:24-31). |
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 29 April 2008 07:37 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by April Gilford
|
|
Friday, 18 April 2008 08:15 |
|
If you have ever shopped for a new Bible, you know what a daunting task it can be. Unless your church or a friend has recommended a specific one, the first question you are faced with is, "Which Bible version should I use?" It seems impossible that there could be so many different choices of the same Holy Book.
So why are there so many different versions? The answer is in the translation. The King James Version, New King James Version, New International Version, American Standard Version, the Living Bible...the list goes on and on and each was translated by different people. While many modern churches teach from the New International Version, there are strong adherants to the King James Version as the only accurate translation. Unless you are fluent in the classical languages and have access to the original documents, it is impossible for the average layman to truly know which version is most accurate. We have to place our trust in the experts, their abilities and their attention to accuracy. Within each translation, you also have the choice of the style of the Bible: a study Bible, expanded Bible with commentary, women's Bible, men's Bible, military Bible, etc. Each of the different styles uses a standard translation but with added footnotes, pictures, daily study texts, and other lessons to help you better understand the Holy text. |
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 29 April 2008 07:36 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
|
Page 9 of 9 |
Copyright © 2010 christianadvicesite.com. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
|